Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anne Trubek's avatar

I recently acquired a novel serialized on Substack and it will be reissued by Belt Publishing in April https://notesfromasmallpress.substack.com/p/substack-and-acquisition

Expand full comment
Rose White's avatar

The model for serialized fiction on Substack exists, and it's sustainable, because it's been popular since the dawn of the phenomenon that engendered it: fanfiction.

The concept of Internet serialization stems directly from print serialization in the form of fan magazines and zines of mid-century Trekdom. Its re-birth online and subsequent assimilation into mainstream consumption of popular media has meant that it is often THE only way some people read long form writing at all (I know, from being on the front lines and meeting people who said they haven't picked up a book in years in favor of the easy access to their favorite characters). I come from an intersection of two worlds, and though I'm integrating myself into a more pluralistic, intellectually oriented sphere, fanfiction was where I cut my teeth in everything I'm practicing now.

I'm not sure what the popular view of fanfiction is to Substackers writ large, but I know for a fact people would pay top dollar for fanfiction if fanfiction wasn't an inherently free enterprise due to its origins in copyrighted material. And of course, that's the problem in gaining an audience for serialized original fiction: fanfiction exists on the backs of existing IP. Even when that IP is little more than an obscure literary text that's fallen out of copyright (fandoms do exist for small niches, despite the popular view of fandom nerds falling into about ten different accepted camps; hi, I'm a recovering former Superwholockian! Commiserate with me?) it still technically creates that connection automatically, which is something I actually criticized in my recent piece Three Cheers for Sweet Reluctance. The further away a story veers from the "canonical" story and characters, the less reads it generally receives.

There are exceptions to that rule, of course, but I am speaking from experience. My most popular fanfictions for my fandom were ones that played directly into popular fandom tropes and pairings. When I tried to be experimental and create original characters interacting with the story I loved, or tried to do something artistic with the material, it was always crickets.

And fanfiction itself is often derided for being that derivative, even though (if you're canonical enough) some of the best writing I've ever had the pleasure of reading has been from fanfiction authors. At the beginning of this century, when Anne Rice discovered how her fans had "taken" her beloved Lestat and put him in situations she never dreamed about, she very publicly denounced fanfiction and pursued legal action against their writers (as a fan of her work, I'm honestly glad she's finally passed; The Vampire Chronicles are having a new renaissance in the AMC series, and it's basically everything she would have HATED in an adaptation; vindication for the fandom!!!)

I think there are two sides to this equation that seem mutually opposed to each other, but actually could work together if one reframed this way: fanfiction is considered derivative and only for juvenile "fandoms," and yet the popularity of fanfiction itself proves that the model for serialized fiction works; original fiction is considered unique, but harder to find an audience for-- but lets be honest here... is anyone of us NOT influenced by what we consume and, more importantly, think critically on? Some of the most celebrated works of literature are, in essence, fanfictions where someone saw so much potential in a story that they had to play around in that universe. One of the best-selling books of this year (and one of the best contemporary books I've read in some time), James, is essentially fanfiction on its basest level. That it was elevated by the author's prolific reputation and his recent bump due to the film American Fiction is beside the point. David Copperfield, as retold by Barbara Kingsolver, won the Pulitzer Prize last year. There is a market for literary fanfiction, and it's honestly one of my favorite genres to read.

Perhaps the way into this whole field of serialized fiction is to EMBRACE the model that already works. Can we serialize "fanfiction" based on our favorite classic texts that inspire us, and make us want to expound on their themes in a critical and literary way? Can that help build the audience that we need for future, more original endeavors? There are several ideas for novels I've had based on my old fandom that I wish I could publish traditionally. We can't necessarily write paid-for fanfiction for things still in copyright, but who's to say a fictional retelling/retooling of Gatsby wouldn't do absolute GANGBUSTERS on this platform (especially taking into account criticism of the actual book that has been floating around; why not improve upon it in this Substackian playground?)?

Expand full comment
48 more comments...

No posts