Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ed's avatar

Thanks for the good introduction to skepticism about “PatEL” (Jargon? I say we need an acronym for Orwell’s dubious essay.)

British linguist Geoffrey Pullum co-author of “The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language” is unrivaled at taking down Orwell and Strunk & White.

http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/LandOfTheFree.pdf

“I believe the success of Elements to be one of the worst things to have happened to English language education in Amer- ica in the past century.”

Pullum aggressively defends the passive voice.

For language obsessives only. (Everyone here, I trust?)

Fear and Loathing of the English Passive

http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/passive_loathing.pdf

Google Pullum and Orwell or Strunk and you’ll find more.

I think Orwell was a fine writer who did not follow his own rules.

Expand full comment
Richard Barbieri's avatar

As I read Oliver I thought of a few of my favorite lines from Shakespeare, a pretty good writer (I dare to cite from memory): “O that this too too solid flesh could melt, thaw, and resolve itself into a dew.” (some editors say “sullied.”) “This hand would rather the multitudinous seas incarnadine, making the green one red.” Should Shakespeare have stopped at “melt”? Or abandoned the whole line before “green one red,” which not only has the artfulness of long and short, and the fruitful ambiguity of “green one” or “one red”?

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts