Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karl Straub's avatar

Update. I’ve now read the entire first section, the framing device that sets up the novel. It’s marvelous, of course.

My sense of it: Waugh pulls off something unusual here. Charles speaks as a man who observes with both irony and poetry. He’s telling jokes he no longer finds funny.

It’s quite an achievement, and it’s a different kind of narrative voice than others I’ve seen Waugh use. Commentators may quibble about ways the Catholicism or the “purple prose” are evidence of inferior Waugh, but my current thought is that opinions about the worth of what he’s trying to say are not as important as how brilliantly he does say it.

That seems to have been Hitchens’ view too, and at the moment I’m with you and Hitchens. I suspect that’s where I’ll stay.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts