Willa Cather's case for reading the great books
eavesdropping upon the past, being let into the great world
On the evenings when there was no whist at the Forresters’, Niel usually sat in his room and read,—but not law, as he was supposed to do. The winter before, when the Forresters were away, and one dull day dragged after another, he had come upon a copious diversion, an almost inexhaustible resource. The high, narrow bookcase in the back office, between the double doors and the wall, was filled from top to bottom with rows of solemn looking volumes bound in dark cloth, which were kept apart from the law library; an almost complete set of the Bohn classics, which Judge Pommeroy had bought long ago when he was a student at the University of Virginia. He had brought them West with him, not because he read them a great deal, but because, in his day, a gentleman had such books in his library, just as he had claret in his cellar. Among them was a set of Byron in three volumes, and last winter, apropos of a quotation which Niel didn't recognize, his uncle advised him to read Byron,—all except Don Juan. That, the Judge remarked, with a deep smile, he “could save until later.” Niel, of course, began with Don Juan. Then he read Tom Jones and Wilhelm Meister and raced on until he came to Montaigne and a complete translation of Ovid. He hadn’t finished yet with these last,—always went back to them after other experiments. These authors seemed to him to know their business. Even in Don Juan there was a little "fooling," but with these gentlemen none.
There were philosophical works in the collection, but he did no more than open and glance at them. He had no curiosity about what men had thought; but about what they had felt and lived, he had a great deal. If anyone had told him that these were classics and represented the wisdom of the ages, he would doubtless have let them alone. But ever since he had first found them for himself, he had been living a double life, with all its guilty enjoyments. He read the Heroides over and over, and felt that they were the most glowing love stories ever told. He did not think of these books as something invented to beguile the idle hour, but as living creatures, caught in the very behaviour of living,—surprised behind their misleading severity of form and phrase. He was eavesdropping upon the past, being let into the great world that had plunged and glittered and sumptuously sinned long before little Western towns were dreamed of. Those rapt evenings beside the lamp gave him a long perspective, influenced his conception of the people about him, made him know just what he wished his own relations with these people to be. For some reason, his reading made him wish to become an architect. If the Judge had left his Bohn library behind him in Kentucky, his nephew’s life might have turned out differently.
from A Lost Lady
I've never read this book, so I don't know the context of this passage. But reading it in isolation, I wonder if there is more irony in it than your heading suggests.
First alert: Bohn Classics. These were (and are) notorious: these were cheap popular editions of famous books, the "Penguin Classics" of their day. But - unlike the Penguin Classics - they were (with the books originally in foreign languages, like Montaigne and Ovid) stilted, literal translations which are all but unreadable; they were also expurgated to remove sexual content. So the "eavesdropping on the past" sounds pointed: he is reading the past through the filter of these really bad editions. Hence also the "misleading severity of form and phrase" - Bohn's Ovid sounds nothing like the real Ovid.
Second alert: Niel's choice of authors: he homes in on books and authors which are notoriously racy (note that, having been advised not to read Don Juan, he goes to that first).
Third alert: when Cather says that he finds 'a little "fooling"' in Don Juan, but "none" in Tom Jones or Ovid. If "fooling" means what I think it does (I'm not sure), then it is a "tell" that the author is aware of the policy of expurgation: because Niel is reading the Bohn editions, he doesn't find the raciness that he is looking for. (If "fooling" means something different, that might not be quite as pointed - but I'd still like to know what it does mean, and why he doesn't find it in these writers - I still suspect irony here, given the authors he has chosen to read.)
Fourth alert: that this reading makes him "wish to become an architect" - in other words, a career choice that is completely unrelated to any of his reading. Doesn't this suggest a capriciousness, both about Niel, and about the way he is reading these books?
I suppose you could call this a "case for reading the great authors" - he does, after all, become obsessed with Ovid's Heroides. But it seems on the face of things a very double-edged one.
But I'd like to hear the opinion of someone who has (unlike me) actually read the book, and knows the context!!
I adore Cather, and I love A Lost Lady in particular. I think of it as the fourth of her Prairie Trilogy. And that is a beautiful passage.