The Common Reader

The Common Reader

Share this post

The Common Reader
The Common Reader
Twenty-five ideas about Love's Labour's Lost
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Shakespeare

Twenty-five ideas about Love's Labour's Lost

War, death, wit, festivity, Arcadia, lyricism, satire

Henry Oliver's avatar
Henry Oliver
Feb 28, 2024
∙ Paid
12

Share this post

The Common Reader
The Common Reader
Twenty-five ideas about Love's Labour's Lost
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
10
1
Share

You can find all the Shakespeare essays here, and the schedule for future meetings here. We meet on Sunday 3rd March, 19.00 UK time to discuss Love’s Labour’s Lost. Paid subscribers can also join this chat about the play.


  1. Directors have often set it in the pre-First World War (or pre-Second World War) period, a tiresome, obvious cliche that oversimplifies to the point of error. The death at the end is not warlike; it is the normal course of things; the old generation gives way to the new; it is time to grow up. “Death will not wait for youth’s chatty utopia” is a much darker ending than “the interruption of war”. As ever, Shakespeare is far ahead of his interpreters.

  2. With that reading in mind, I find this play newly topical. In our own time, the delay of marriage and children, the dreams of a better world being more spoken about than performed, serve to make this a very relevant play indeed.

  3. Love’s Labour’s Lost is also topical as regards language. Post modernism saw language as a system of infinitely deferred meaning, like the piling up of puns and ambiguities in the speech of Navarre and his men. Against this, we have the reaction that words are relatively fixed in meaning, rooted in the real world, which relates to the way the Princess and her women use speech. Deconstruction cannot be infinite: death is one great certainty of a fixed reality.

  4. Shakespeare was writing in response to the work of the aristocratic poet-courtier Philip Sidney. The Arden introduction by H.R. Woudhuysen has many good details on this point. Sidney says plays must not mix kings and clowns; Shakespeare does so. Sidney disapproves of making the sinful ridiculous; Shakespeare does so. Sidney wants decorum; Shakespeare gives us bawdy.

  5. Sidney’s sonnet sequence Astrophil ad Stella is, in Woudhuysen’s words, “a story of erotic obsession without resolution.” So is Love’s Labour’s Lost. Several times, characters speak in sonnets. And Sidney’s sonnets were published in the 1590s, perfect timing for Shakespeare to be influenced by them.

  6. There are multiple other points of comparison, even down to the presence of Muscovites. As Woudhuysen says, “Shakespeare is showing that he has mastered Sidney’s writings and can overgo them.”


    The rest of this essay is for paid subscribers. Below the paywall, you’ll read about festive comedy, The Taming of the Shrew, the unpopularity of this play, and more.

    A paid subscription gives you access to essays where you learn the different ways of understanding and interpreting works of literature. It’s approximately the cost of a cup of coffee once a week, but gives you access to all my writing. And the book club.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Common Reader to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Henry Oliver
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More